How we compare
An honest comparison.
We are not trying to be everything, so here is where each tool shines and where New Journey takes a different shape.
vs Linear
Linear set the bar for modern issue tracking and we respect the craft, but New Journey takes a different shape: the same sharp issue model alongside private channels for the conversations that need one and a workspace that keeps working when the network does not.
Where Linear wins today
- Best-in-class issue tracker with premium polish
- Fast keyboard-first UX
- Strong agent and AI integrations
- Mature roadmap views and integrations marketplace
Where New Journey wins today
- Private channels for the engineering conversations that need them
- A full copy of the workspace on every device
- Works offline — and catches up in seconds
- Self-host when you'd rather own the stack
| Feature | Linear | New Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Data ownership | Hosted SaaS | Lives on your devices first |
| Chat privacy | Server-readable at rest | Only the people in the channel can read it |
| Offline capability | Limited; mostly online | Full offline reads and writes; both sides merge automatically |
| Planning depth | Best-in-class issues, cycles, roadmaps | Issues + sub-issues + dependencies + cycles |
| Document depth | Light docs | Docs alongside planning, private when you need them |
| Integrations marketplace | Broad and mature | Smaller, growing |
| Self-host option | No | Yes (planned) |
| Audit logs | Available on higher tiers | Built in |
| Pricing model | Per-seat SaaS | Per-seat, with self-host as an alternative |
vs Jira
Jira can model nearly any process, and that flexibility has earned it a permanent spot in regulated industries. New Journey takes the opposite bet: a smaller, sharper model most teams can adopt without hiring a workflow architect.
Where Jira wins today
- Deep enterprise customization
- A workflow engine that can model any process you can name
- Decades of integrations and audit-grade governance
Where New Journey wins today
- A simpler model — issues, sub-issues, dependencies, cycles. No schema sprawl
- Faster onboarding. New people are useful in days, not weeks
- Private chat in the same workspace
- Works the same way offline as online
| Feature | Jira | New Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Data ownership | Hosted (Cloud) or self-host (Data Center) | Lives on your devices first; self-host optional |
| Chat privacy | No native chat; relies on integrations | Private channels right next to the work |
| Offline capability | Minimal | Full offline reads and writes — both sides merge automatically |
| Planning depth | Extreme — configurable workflows for any process | Issues + sub-issues + dependencies + cycles, no schema sprawl |
| Document depth | Confluence (separate product) | Docs in the same workspace |
| Integrations marketplace | Decades-deep ecosystem | Smaller, growing |
| Self-host option | Yes (Data Center, enterprise) | Yes (planned) |
| Audit logs | Mature, enterprise-grade | Built in |
| Pricing model | Per-seat SaaS or enterprise license | Per-seat, simpler tiers |
vs Slack
Slack made workplace chat feel casual and integrated, and we are not trying to replace the watercooler — we are putting the conversations that need privacy (incident threads, security discussions, M&A talk) right next to the work they are about.
Where Slack wins today
- Huge integration ecosystem
- Casual-first conversation UX
- Hosted, managed, quick to set up
- Mature workflow automations
Where New Journey wins today
- Private by default — admins can't read messages, architecturally
- Chat lives next to the work it's about
- Workspace stays open offline
- One app for planning and chat
| Feature | Slack | New Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Data ownership | Hosted SaaS; admins can read messages | Lives on your devices first; admins can't read message bodies |
| Chat privacy | Server-readable at rest | Only the people in the channel can read it |
| Offline capability | Limited cache for recent channels | Full offline reads |
| Planning depth | No native planning | Native planning + analytics in the same app |
| Document depth | Canvas (light), Posts | Native docs in the workspace |
| Integrations marketplace | Vast ecosystem | Smaller, growing |
| Self-host option | No | Yes (planned) |
| Audit logs | Enterprise plans | Built in (metadata only — bodies stay private) |
| Pricing model | Per-seat SaaS | Per-seat, simpler tiers |
vs Notion
Notion is the gold standard for flexible long-form docs, while New Journey is more opinionated: planning and analytics are first-class, chat is private by default, and the whole workspace keeps working offline.
Where Notion wins today
- Best-in-class long-form docs and database flexibility
- Flexible block model
- Mature template ecosystem
Where New Journey wins today
- Planning + analytics are native, not bolted on
- Private chat lives next to the docs
- Workspace open offline — read and write
- The whole loop in one app
| Feature | Notion | New Journey |
|---|---|---|
| Data ownership | Hosted SaaS | Lives on your devices first |
| Chat privacy | No native chat; comments are server-readable | Private chat alongside docs |
| Offline capability | Limited and read-only | Full offline reads and writes |
| Planning depth | Database-backed but bolted on | Native issues, cycles, dependencies |
| Document depth | Best-in-class block model | Solid docs, optimized for planning workflows |
| Integrations marketplace | Mature template + integration ecosystem | Smaller, growing |
| Self-host option | No | Yes (planned) |
| Audit logs | Enterprise plans | Built in |
| Pricing model | Per-seat SaaS | Per-seat, simpler tiers |
Want a side-by-side demo?
Talk to sales and we will walk you through your team's exact workflow.